On Tue, May 9, 2023 at 3:15 AM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
>
> On Mon, May 08, 2023 at 07:15:20PM +0530, Dilip Kumar wrote:
> > I am able to reproduce this using the steps given above, I am also
> > trying to analyze this further. I will send the update once I get
> > some clue.
>
> Have you been able to reproduce this on HEAD or at the top of
> REL_15_STABLE, or is that 15.2-ish without fa5dd46?
>
I am able to reproduce on REL_15_STABLE as well with your test case.
The only difference is without fa5dd46 the issue gets reproduced just
in a couple of seconds and very consistent OTOH on REL_15_STABLE it
takes time to reproduce 2-3 mins and also reproduction is not very
consistent.
--
Regards,
Dilip Kumar
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com