On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 8:57 AM, Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org> wrote:
> On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 3:55 PM, Jim Mlodgenski <jimmy76@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 8:53 AM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 03:43:04PM +0300, Dave Page wrote:
> >> > > and you are right they didn't upgrade 9.3.X. I am not sure what
> >> > > requirement we have for packagers listed on our website to have the
> >> > > most
> >> > > recent versions of _all_ major releases. If they just didn't list
> >> > > 9.3.X anymore and had the most recent major release available, is
> that
> >> > > sufficient? Does someone know? I am CC'ing two of our web people.
> >> >
> >> > We certainly expect anything that they list to be up to date, and
> >> > coordinated with the official release. I don't think we have a policy
> >> > on which branches should be supported though (perhaps we should - in
> >> > which case, I'd push for all of them).
> >>
> >> OK, should someone contact BigSQL and ask them to either remove the
> >> 9.3.X release or update it? I can do that. Do we want to require all
> >> supported branches and check all existing links?
> >>
> >
> > We'll get 9.3.6 up ASAP. It must have just fallen through the cracks.
> >
>
> Thanks Jim. Can you check that whoever your representative on the
> -packagers list is is the most appropriate person please? That's one
> way it might have been missed I guess.
>
>
9.3.6 is now up