Thank you guys! You're the best!
Christian B. Almeida
2015-05-12 16:44 GMT-03:00 Jim Mlodgenski <jimmy76@gmail.com>:
>
>
> On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 8:57 AM, Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 3:55 PM, Jim Mlodgenski <jimmy76@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 8:53 AM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
>> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 03:43:04PM +0300, Dave Page wrote:
>> >> > > and you are right they didn't upgrade 9.3.X. I am not sure what
>> >> > > requirement we have for packagers listed on our website to have the
>> >> > > most
>> >> > > recent versions of _all_ major releases. If they just didn't list
>> >> > > 9.3.X anymore and had the most recent major release available, is
>> that
>> >> > > sufficient? Does someone know? I am CC'ing two of our web people.
>> >> >
>> >> > We certainly expect anything that they list to be up to date, and
>> >> > coordinated with the official release. I don't think we have a policy
>> >> > on which branches should be supported though (perhaps we should - in
>> >> > which case, I'd push for all of them).
>> >>
>> >> OK, should someone contact BigSQL and ask them to either remove the
>> >> 9.3.X release or update it? I can do that. Do we want to require all
>> >> supported branches and check all existing links?
>> >>
>> >
>> > We'll get 9.3.6 up ASAP. It must have just fallen through the cracks.
>> >
>>
>> Thanks Jim. Can you check that whoever your representative on the
>> -packagers list is is the most appropriate person please? That's one
>> way it might have been missed I guess.
>>
>>
> 9.3.6 is now up
>
>