On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 12:42 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> If we're keeping the "Source code" column, I'd be inclined to keep
> "Language" adjacent to that. When thinking of a function as a black
> box, both language and source code are implementation details; but
> all the other properties listed here are of interest anyway.
OK, no objections to that. And this gives the attached.
> (Of course, if we were to get rid of "Source code", the point
> would be moot ...)
I still think that having source code is useful for debugging, so I
left it out. Note for the committer who will perhaps pick up this
patch: I left out "Source Code", but feel free to remove it if you
think the contrary. It is easier to remove code than adding it back.
--
Michael