On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 1:01 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> (2) My inclination would be not to back-patch. This change could break
> configurations that worked before, and the lack of prior complaints
> says that not many people are having a problem with it.
That's fourteen years without complains, still I cannot imagine any
cases where it would be a problem as people who would have faced this
problem but not reported it have likely just enforced the FS to handle
case-insensitivity for paths. Or they just relied on the default: on
Windows the default is to be case-insensitive, as much as OSX. So the
proposed patch handles things better with case-sensitive paths,
without really impacting users with case-insensive FS.
I see the point of not back-patching the change though.
--
Michael