Re: [HACKERS] tap tests on older branches fail if concurrency is used

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Michael Paquier
Тема Re: [HACKERS] tap tests on older branches fail if concurrency is used
Дата
Msg-id CAB7nPqQ-Phg2C3yt_i33EmS4JYWb9Z-o1cmaaq+heTYvWZvA6Q@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] tap tests on older branches fail if concurrency is used  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] tap tests on older branches fail if concurrency is used  (Craig Ringer <craig@2ndquadrant.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 10:48 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
>> when using
>> $ cat ~/.proverc
>> -j9
>> some tests fail for me in 9.4 and 9.5.
>
> Weren't there fixes specifically intended to make that safe, awhile ago?

60f826c has not been back-patched. While this would fix parallel runs
with make's --jobs, PROVE_FLAGS="-j X" would still fail.
-- 
Michael

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Michael Paquier
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] tap tests on older branches fail if concurrency is used
Следующее
От: amul sul
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Adding support for Default partition in partitioning