On Wed, 25 May 2022 at 15:09, David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com> wrote:
> I didn't test the performance of an aset.c context. I imagine it's
> likely to be less overhead due to aset.c being generally slower from
> having to jump through a few more hoops during palloc/pfree.
I've attached the results from doing the same test with a standard
allocset context.
With the exception of the 8 byte chunk size test, there just seems to
be a 3-4% slowdown on my machine.
David