On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 9:10 PM Peter Eisentraut
<peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>
> On 2020-01-20 06:30, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> > Rebased against 40d964ec997f64227bc0ff5e058dc4a5770a70a9
>
> I'm not sure that description of parallel vacuum in the middle of
> non-full vs. full vacuum is actually that good.
>
I have done like that because parallel vacuum is the default. I mean
when the user runs vacuum command, it will invoke workers to perform
index cleanup based on some conditions.
> I think those sentences
> should be moved to a separate paragraph.
>
It seems more natural to me to add immediately after vacuum
explanation, but I might be wrong. After the above explanation, if
you still think it is better to move into a separate paragraph, I can
do that.
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com