Re: Hash Joins vs. Bloom Filters / take 2

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Dmitry Dolgov
Тема Re: Hash Joins vs. Bloom Filters / take 2
Дата
Msg-id CA+q6zcXvVj-n-_+f3j+k_mnffAhw9gieNPfaoOKtKsgsBqQtwg@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Hash Joins vs. Bloom Filters / take 2  (Jim Finnerty <jfinnert@amazon.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Nov 1, 2018 at 10:17 PM Tomas Vondra
<tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>
> I haven't really planned to work on this anytime soon, unfortunately,
> which is why I proposed to mark it as RwF at the end of the last CF. I
> already have a couple other patches there, and (more importantly) I
> don't have a very clear idea how to implement the filter pushdown.
>
> That being said I still think it'd be an interesting improvement, and if
> someone wants to take over I'm available as a reviewer / tester ...

Since no one expressed any particular desire to take over the patch, I'm
marking it as "Returned with feedback". Although I really like the discussion
that happened here, maybe it worth to move a part of it to the wiki under the
"possible improvements" flag?


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: pg_config wrongly marked as not parallel safe?
Следующее
От: Dmitry Dolgov
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Two pass CheckDeadlock in contentent case