Re: pg_config wrongly marked as not parallel safe?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: pg_config wrongly marked as not parallel safe?
Дата
Msg-id 17826.1543591964@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: pg_config wrongly marked as not parallel safe?  (Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com>)
Ответы Re: pg_config wrongly marked as not parallel safe?  (Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com> writes:
> On 11/30/18 3:30 AM, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI wrote:
>> # And returning to the topic, I vote for pg_config should be "stable".

> And on that note, Does this change does warrant backpatching, or should
> be applied to master only?

I don't think back-patching the catalog change is really a good idea.
The amount of work involved (e.g. release-noting how to perform the
update on existing databases) is way out of proportion to the benefit
for this particular case.

            regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Dmitry Dolgov
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Flexible permissions for REFRESH MATERIALIZED VIEW
Следующее
От: Dmitry Dolgov
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Hash Joins vs. Bloom Filters / take 2