Re: [HACKERS] Two pass CheckDeadlock in contentent case

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Dmitry Dolgov
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Two pass CheckDeadlock in contentent case
Дата
Msg-id CA+q6zcV3RUDDL9_8AgWhEzB8z5YPq7pHH=tQxsPMyJ4kLXhKuA@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] Two pass CheckDeadlock in contentent case  (Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] Two pass CheckDeadlock in contentent case  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
> On Tue, Nov 6, 2018 at 5:19 AM Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> The idea of this patch seems reasonable.
>
> I've looked at this patch. This patch still can be applied cleanly to
> the current HEAD and passed regression tests.
>
> Here is review comments.

Thanks for the review. Just for the records, patch still has no conflicts and
pass all the tests. Yura, do you have any plans about this patch, could you
respond to the feedback? In the meantime I'm moving it to the next CF.

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Dmitry Dolgov
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Hash Joins vs. Bloom Filters / take 2
Следующее
От: ilmari@ilmari.org (Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker)
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [PATCH] Improve tab completion for CREATE TABLE