Re: [HACKERS] Two pass CheckDeadlock in contentent case

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Michael Paquier
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Two pass CheckDeadlock in contentent case
Дата
Msg-id 20190204050532.GJ29064@paquier.xyz
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] Two pass CheckDeadlock in contentent case  (Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 04:44:37PM +0100, Dmitry Dolgov wrote:
> Thanks for the review. Just for the records, patch still has no conflicts and
> pass all the tests. Yura, do you have any plans about this patch, could you
> respond to the feedback? In the meantime I'm moving it to the next CF.

No answers since the latest review, so I am marking the patch as
returned with feedback.
--
Michael
Вложения

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Michael Paquier
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Reduce amount of WAL generated by CREATE INDEX for gist, gin andsp-gist
Следующее
От: Michael Paquier
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: proposal: plpgsql pragma statement