Re: Re: Proposal: Store "timestamptz" of database creation on "pg_database"

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Robert Haas
Тема Re: Re: Proposal: Store "timestamptz" of database creation on "pg_database"
Дата
Msg-id CA+TgmobRNXtSPMp2kdgeuacT8NS22mH4eh9_AJ2a0zEeAo_S5Q@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Re: Proposal: Store "timestamptz" of database creation on "pg_database"  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 1:07 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> wrote:
> On 1/3/13 3:26 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
>> It's true, as we've often
>> said here, that leveraging the OS facilities means that we get the
>> benefit of improving OS facilities "for free" - but it also means that
>> we never exceed what the OS facilities are able to provide.
>
> And that should be the deciding factor, shouldn't it?  Clearly, the OS
> timestamps do not satisfy the requirements of tracking database object
> creation times.

Yes, I think so.

But I am not entirely sold on tracking the creation time of every SQL
object.  It might be all right, but what about catalog bloat?

I am on board for databases, and for tables, at any rate.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Improve compression speeds in pg_lzcompress.c
Следующее
От: Kohei KaiGai
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: recent ALTER whatever .. SET SCHEMA refactoring