Re: pg_retainxlog for inclusion in 9.3?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Robert Haas
Тема Re: pg_retainxlog for inclusion in 9.3?
Дата
Msg-id CA+TgmobOfoDYhRvvTL5_2FnftauJo6tbC7dV_JwqiJyc2Vg8fw@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: pg_retainxlog for inclusion in 9.3?  (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>)
Ответы Re: pg_retainxlog for inclusion in 9.3?  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Re: pg_retainxlog for inclusion in 9.3?  (Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri@2ndQuadrant.fr>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 11:32 AM, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote:
> Any particular reason? It goes pretty tightly together with
> pg_receivexlog, which is why I'd prefer putting it alongside that one.
> But if you have a good argument against it, I can change my mind :)

Mostly that it seems like a hack, and I suspect we may come up with a
better way to do this in the future.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Charles Gomes
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Writing Trigger Functions in C
Следующее
От: Heikki Linnakangas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: PATCH: Split stats file per database WAS: autovacuum stress-testing our system