On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 10:09 AM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 6:46 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 2:20 AM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Okay, that makes sense to me apart from minor issue reported by
>>> Andrew. I think we might want to slightly rephrase the comments on
>>> top of copyParamList() which indicates only about dynamic parameter
>>> hooks.
>>
>> I don't see why it needs to be changed - can you explain in more
>> detail what you have in mind?
>>
>
> Basically after this function, usage of ParamListInfo doesn't need to
> care for value of paramMask as you have already ignored the required
> params. I think it is quite apparent from the code, but as the
> similar information is mention for dynamic parameter hooks, I thought
> we might want to update it. If you don't feel the need of same, then
> leave it as it is.
Yeah, I don't see a need to mention that.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company