On Fri, Apr 19, 2024 at 3:31 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> That would be a reasonable answer if we deem the problem to be
> just "the buildfarm is unhappy". What I'm wondering about is
> whether the feature will be useful to end users with this
> pathname length restriction.
Possibly you're getting a little too enthusiastic about these revert
requests, because I'd say it's at least a decade too late to get rid
of pg_basebackup.
As discussed elsewhere, I do rather hope that pg_combinebackup will
eventually know how to operate on tar files as well, but right now it
doesn't.
--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com