On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 9:52 PM, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
<horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
> I thought it's to be deprecated for some reason so I'm leaving
> wal_keep_segments in '# of segments' even though the new GUC is
> in MB. I'm a bit uneasy that the two similar settings are in
> different units. Couldn't we turn it into MB taking this
> opportunity if we will keep wal_keep_segments, changing its name
> to min_wal_keep_size? max_slot_wal_keep_size could be changed to
> just max_wal_keep_size along with it.
This seems like it's a little bit of a separate topic from what this
thread about, but FWIW, +1 for standardizing on MB.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company