At Thu, 2 Aug 2018 09:05:33 -0400, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote in
<CA+TgmoYVrKY0W0jigJymFZo0ewkQoWGfLLpiTSgJLQN3tcHGTg@mail.gmail.com>
> On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 9:52 PM, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
> <horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
> > I thought it's to be deprecated for some reason so I'm leaving
> > wal_keep_segments in '# of segments' even though the new GUC is
> > in MB. I'm a bit uneasy that the two similar settings are in
> > different units. Couldn't we turn it into MB taking this
> > opportunity if we will keep wal_keep_segments, changing its name
> > to min_wal_keep_size? max_slot_wal_keep_size could be changed to
> > just max_wal_keep_size along with it.
>
> This seems like it's a little bit of a separate topic from what this
> thread about, but FWIW, +1 for standardizing on MB.
Thanks. Ok, I'll raise this after separately with this.
regards,
--
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center