Re: The missing pg_get_*def functions

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Robert Haas
Тема Re: The missing pg_get_*def functions
Дата
Msg-id CA+TgmoYJH-rRrhR63d5pM-x1-26DcBDbZ2LAS8-eG4sukw1yrQ@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: The missing pg_get_*def functions  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: The missing pg_get_*def functions  (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 7:58 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> The long and the short of it here is that there isn't any very good
> reason to migrate any of the existing pg_dump-side functionality into
> server-side functions, ....

There are a number of good reasons to do just that, which have been
previously discussed.

> and especially not server-side functions that
> aren't in C.

+1.

> One of the things that we frequently recommend when doing
> upgrades is that you do the dump with the newer version's pg_dump, so
> as to get the benefits of any bug fixes that are in it.  The more
> dump functionality is on the server side, the less opportunity we have
> to repair things that way.

But why wouldn't we be able to fix the version in the server, if it
turns out to be buggy?  I suppose we wouldn't fix bugs discovered
after EOL, but I'm not sure that's a sufficient objection.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Remaining beta blockers
Следующее
От: Stephen Frost
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Remaining beta blockers