Re: File Systems Compared
От
Luke Lonergan
Тема
Re: File Systems Compared
Дата
Msg-id
C19C4089.14E0D%llonergan@greenplum.com
Ответ на
Re: File Systems Compared (Brian Hurt)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
File Systems Compared Brian Wipf <brian@clickspace.com>
Re: File Systems Compared Alexander Staubo <alex@purefiction.net>
Re: File Systems Compared Markus Schiltknecht <markus@bluegap.ch>
Re: File Systems Compared "Steinar H. Gunderson" <sgunderson@bigfoot.com>
Re: File Systems Compared Markus Schiltknecht <markus@bluegap.ch>
[offtopic] Word wrapping "Steinar H. Gunderson" <sgunderson@bigfoot.com>
Re: File Systems Compared Bruno Wolff III <bruno@wolff.to>
Re: File Systems Compared Arnaud Lesauvage <thewild@freesurf.fr>
Re: File Systems Compared Michael Stone <mstone+postgres@mathom.us>
Re: [offtopic] File Systems Compared Brian Wipf <brian@clickspace.com>
Re: File Systems Compared Greg Smith <gsmith@gregsmith.com>
Re: File Systems Compared Brian Hurt <bhurt@janestcapital.com>
Re: File Systems Compared "Luke Lonergan" <llonergan@greenplum.com>
Re: File Systems Compared "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>
Re: File Systems Compared Brian Hurt <bhurt@janestcapital.com>
Re: File Systems Compared "Luke Lonergan" <llonergan@greenplum.com>
Re: File Systems Compared Brian Hurt <bhurt@janestcapital.com>
Re: File Systems Compared "Merlin Moncure" <mmoncure@gmail.com>
Re: File Systems Compared Florian Weimer <fweimer@bfk.de>
Re: File Systems Compared Mark Lewis <mark.lewis@mir3.com>
Re: File Systems Compared Bruno Wolff III <bruno@wolff.to>
Re: File Systems Compared Jim Nasby <decibel@decibel.org>
Re: File Systems Compared Bruno Wolff III <bruno@wolff.to>
Re: File Systems Compared Ron Mayer <rm_pg@cheapcomplexdevices.com>
Re: File Systems Compared Bruno Wolff III <bruno@wolff.to>
Re: File Systems Compared Bruno Wolff III <bruno@wolff.to>
Re: File Systems Compared Bruno Wolff III <bruno@wolff.to>
Re: File Systems Compared Bruno Wolff III <bruno@wolff.to>
Re: File Systems Compared Ron <rjpeace@earthlink.net>
Re: File Systems Compared Brian Wipf <brian@clickspace.com>
Re: Areca 1260 Performance (was: File Systems Compared) Brian Wipf <brian@clickspace.com>
Re: Areca 1260 Performance (was: File Systems Ron <rjpeace@earthlink.net>
Re: Areca 1260 Performance Brian Wipf <brian@clickspace.com>
Re: Areca 1260 Performance Ron <rjpeace@earthlink.net>
Re: Areca 1260 Performance Brian Wipf <brian@clickspace.com>
Re: Areca 1260 Performance Shane Ambler <pgsql@007Marketing.com>
Re: Areca 1260 Performance Gene <genekhart@gmail.com>
Re: Areca 1260 Performance Ron <rjpeace@earthlink.net>
Re: File Systems Compared "Merlin Moncure" <mmoncure@gmail.com>
Brian, On 12/6/06 8:40 AM, "Brian Hurt" wrote: > But actually looking things up, I see that PCI-Express has a theoretical 8 > Gbit/sec, or about 800Mbyte/sec. It's PCI-X that's 533 MByte/sec. So there's > still some headroom available there. See here for the official specifications of both: http://www.pcisig.com/specifications/pcix_20/ Note that PCI-X version 1.0 at 133MHz runs at 1GB/s. It's a parallel bus, 64 bits wide (8 bytes) and runs at 133MHz, so 8 x 133 ~= 1 gigabyte/second. PCI Express with 16 lanes (PCIe x16) can transfer data at 4GB/s. The Arecas use (PCIe x8, see here: http://www.areca.com.tw/products/html/pcie-sata.htm), so they can do 2GB/s. - Luke
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления