On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 19:41, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> wrote:
>
>>> I thought the proposal on the table was to add "peer" (or some other
>>> name) to refer to the unix-socket auth method, and use that term
>>> preferentially in the docs, while continuing to accept "ident" as an
>>> old name for it. Is that really too confusing?
>
> What about the pg_ident file? Are we going to rename it? Are we
We should've done that long ago - it's already used for things that
aren't ident. If anything, it should be pg_usermap.conf.
> (better) going to have separate files for pg_peer and pg_ident?
Why? It already supports multiple maps...
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/