On 9/16/17 08:52, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 9/15/17 13:35, Arseny Sher wrote:
>> Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
>>
>>> Here is a simple patch that fixes this, based on my original proposal
>>> point #4.
>> I checked, it passes the tests and solves the problem. However, isn't
>> this
>>
>> + if (slotname || !subenabled)
>>
>> is a truism? Is it possible that subscription has no slot but still
>> enabled?
> Yeah, we could just remove the _at_commit() branch entirely. That would
> effectively undo the change in 7e174fa793a2df89fe03d002a5087ef67abcdde8,
> but I don't see any other choice for now. And the practical impact
> would be quite limited.
Fix committed based on this discussion.
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers