Re: [HACKERS] RTE_NAMEDTUPLESTORE, enrtuples and comments

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: [HACKERS] RTE_NAMEDTUPLESTORE, enrtuples and comments
Дата
Msg-id 908.1497362707@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] RTE_NAMEDTUPLESTORE, enrtuples and comments  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] RTE_NAMEDTUPLESTORE, enrtuples and comments  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> Perhaps this is a silly question, but I don't particularly see what's
> wrong with:

> 3. Do nothing.

Well, the fundamental problem is that the RTE is a lousy place to keep
rowcount estimates.  That breaks assorted desirable properties like
querytrees being readonly to planning/execution (not that we don't
end up copying them anyway, but up to now that's been because of bad
implementation not because the representation was broken by design).

I agree that it's probably not so badly broken that we have to fix it
in time for v10, but this is not where we want to be in the long run.
        regards, tom lane



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Peter Eisentraut
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] pgrowlocks relkind check
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Detection of IPC::Run presence in SSL TAP tests