Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Amit Langote
Тема Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning
Дата
Msg-id 8a7bffb8-034d-bbe0-9ad5-066dbf726ef8@lab.ntt.co.jp
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning  (Rajkumar Raghuwanshi <rajkumar.raghuwanshi@enterprisedb.com>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning  (Rajkumar Raghuwanshi <rajkumar.raghuwanshi@enterprisedb.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Thanks Rajkumar.

On 2017/10/23 15:58, Rajkumar Raghuwanshi wrote:
> I have tried to apply attached patch. patch applied cleanly on commit id -
> bf54c0f05c0a58db17627724a83e1b6d4ec2712c
> but make failed with below error.
> 
> ./../../../src/include/nodes/relation.h:2126: error: redefinition of
> typedef ‘AppendRelInfo’
> ../../../../src/include/nodes/relation.h:584: note: previous declaration of
> ‘AppendRelInfo’ was here
> make[4]: *** [gistbuild.o] Error 1

The compiler I have here (gcc (GCC) 6.2.0) didn't complain like that for
this typedef redefinition introduced by the 0002 patch, but it seems that
it's not needed anyway, so got rid of that line in the attached updated patch.

Fixed one more useless diff in 0002, but no changes in any other patch.

Thanks,
Amit

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Вложения

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Craig Ringer
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] How to determine that a TransactionId is really aborted?
Следующее
От: "Tsunakawa, Takayuki"
Дата:
Сообщение: [HACKERS] [bug fix] ECPG: fails to recognize embedded parameters