On 23 October 2017 at 05:44, Eric Ridge <eebbrr@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Oct 22, 2017, at 3:24 PM, Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie> wrote:
>> Again, you'll probably need to put this low level requirement into
>> context if you want sound advice from this list.
>
> I'm just thinking out lout here, but the context is likely something along the lines of externally storing all
transactionids, and periodically asking Postgres if they're known-to-be-aborted-by-all-transactions -- one at a time.
I think Peter is asking "why?".
-- Craig Ringer http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers