Re: Re: synchronous_commit and synchronous_replication Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Efficient transaction-controlled synchronous replication.

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Dimitri Fontaine
Тема Re: Re: synchronous_commit and synchronous_replication Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Efficient transaction-controlled synchronous replication.
Дата
Msg-id 877hb914mp.fsf@hi-media-techno.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Re: synchronous_commit and synchronous_replication Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Efficient transaction-controlled synchronous replication.  (Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: Re: synchronous_commit and synchronous_replication Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Efficient transaction-controlled synchronous replication.  (Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> writes:
> Hmm.. I think that we reached the consensus about merging two GUCs
> in previous discussion. You argue that synchronization level should be
> controlled in separate two parameters?

No, sorry about confusion.  One GUC is better.  What I'm wondering is
why commit it *now*, because I think we didn't yet decide on what the
supported behaviors supported in 9.1 should be.

Regards,
-- 
Dimitri Fontaine
http://2ndQuadrant.fr     PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Heikki Linnakangas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Transforming IN (...) to ORs, volatility
Следующее
От: Heikki Linnakangas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Re: synchronous_commit and synchronous_replication Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Efficient transaction-controlled synchronous replication.