Re: Re: synchronous_commit and synchronous_replication Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Efficient transaction-controlled synchronous replication.

On 05.04.2011 11:31, Dimitri Fontaine wrote:
> Fujii Masao<masao.fujii@gmail.com>  writes:
>> Hmm.. I think that we reached the consensus about merging two GUCs
>> in previous discussion. You argue that synchronization level should be
>> controlled in separate two parameters?
>
> No, sorry about confusion.  One GUC is better.  What I'm wondering is
> why commit it *now*, because I think we didn't yet decide on what the
> supported behaviors supported in 9.1 should be.

What do you mean by "supported behaviors"?

--   Heikki Linnakangas  EnterpriseDB   http://www.enterprisedb.com