Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Need concrete "Why Postgres not MySQL"

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Greg Stark
Тема Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Need concrete "Why Postgres not MySQL"
Дата
Msg-id 871xvfjgea.fsf@stark.dyndns.tv
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Need concrete "Why Postgres not MySQL"  (Andreas Pflug <pgadmin@pse-consulting.de>)
Ответы Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Need concrete "Why Postgres not MySQL"  ("Shridhar Daithankar" <shridhar_daithankar@persistent.co.in>)
Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Need concrete "Why Postgres not MySQL"  ("Shridhar Daithankar" <shridhar_daithankar@persistent.co.in>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Andreas Pflug <pgadmin@pse-consulting.de> writes:

> Shridhar Daithankar wrote:
> 
> >On 21 Aug 2003 at 0:22, Ian Barwick wrote:
> >
> >>* DDL
> >>- Data definition language (table creation statements etc.) in MySQL
> >>are not transaction based and cannot be rolled back.
> >
> > Just wondering, what other databases has transactable DDLs? oracle seems to
> > have autonomous transactions which is arthogonal.
> >
> M$ SQL2000 has (and previous versions had too, I believe)

In Oracle DDL (including truncate!) was special and wasn't in a transaction.
I always just assumed that was just the way it had to be.

-- 
greg



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Andrew Dunstan
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Can't find thread on Linux memory overcommit
Следующее
От: Jon Jensen
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Can't find thread on Linux memory overcommit