Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Need concrete "Why Postgres not MySQL"

On 21 Aug 2003 at 9:21, Greg Stark wrote:

> Andreas Pflug <pgadmin@pse-consulting.de> writes:
> 
> > Shridhar Daithankar wrote:
> > 
> > >On 21 Aug 2003 at 0:22, Ian Barwick wrote:
> > >
> > >>* DDL
> > >>- Data definition language (table creation statements etc.) in MySQL
> > >>are not transaction based and cannot be rolled back.
> > >
> > > Just wondering, what other databases has transactable DDLs? oracle seems to
> > > have autonomous transactions which is arthogonal.
> > >
> > M$ SQL2000 has (and previous versions had too, I believe)

Any pointers to documentation?

ByeShridhar

--
divorce, n:    A change of wife.