Re: open items for 9.4

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: open items for 9.4
Дата
Msg-id 8506.1412016282@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: open items for 9.4  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: open items for 9.4  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Re: open items for 9.4  (Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>)
Re: open items for 9.4  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> The items I see are:

> - Remove xloginsert_slots/xloginsert_locks GUC - Not yet!!

> The text seems to indicate that there's some disagreement on this
> point.  I don't have a strong opinion on whether or not to keep the
> GUC, but if we're going to remove it it should probably happen before
> beta3.  It's going to be impossible to remove once we've released with
> it, I suspect.

The lack of any documentation for the GUC (neither in config.sgml or
postgresql.conf.sample) suggests very very strongly that it was not
meant to be shipped.  If we don't remove it I will certainly insist
that it be documented adequately.

Personally I think a hardwired #define should be plenty.  What's the
argument that users will need to tune this at runtime?
        regards, tom lane



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Andres Freund
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: open items for 9.4
Следующее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: test_shm_mq failing on anole (was: Sending out a request for more buildfarm animals?)