Re: open items for 9.4

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Andres Freund
Тема Re: open items for 9.4
Дата
Msg-id 20140929200528.GD2084@awork2.anarazel.de
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: open items for 9.4  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: open items for 9.4  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 2014-09-29 14:44:42 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> > The items I see are:
> 
> > - Remove xloginsert_slots/xloginsert_locks GUC - Not yet!!
> 
> > The text seems to indicate that there's some disagreement on this
> > point.  I don't have a strong opinion on whether or not to keep the
> > GUC, but if we're going to remove it it should probably happen before
> > beta3.  It's going to be impossible to remove once we've released with
> > it, I suspect.
> 
> The lack of any documentation for the GUC (neither in config.sgml or
> postgresql.conf.sample) suggests very very strongly that it was not
> meant to be shipped.

That's definitely the case.

> If we don't remove it I will certainly insist that it be documented
> adequately.

Definitely.

> Personally I think a hardwired #define should be plenty.  What's the
> argument that users will need to tune this at runtime?

That right now it can make quite noticeable differences in
scalability. And we have not much data to justify 8 as the default. And
that's surely not going to change if we require recompiles.

Greetings,

Andres Freund

-- Andres Freund                       http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training &
Services



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Andrew Dunstan
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: json (b) and null fields
Следующее
От: Pavel Stehule
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: json (b) and null fields