Re: autovacuum daemon question...

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Joe Maldonado
Тема Re: autovacuum daemon question...
Дата
Msg-id 824355640511091334t65d96740h465e557308ab1d9a@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: autovacuum daemon question...  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-admin
I like the idea of having a autovacuum_log_min_messages.  From my previous experience the pg_autovacuum.log files have been useful in diagnosing problems in the field.

- Joe

On 11/9/05, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
Joe Maldonado <joe.maldonado@gmail.com> writes:
> I agree...for now while I'm developing and debugging my application I can
> have the logging be that verbose...I agree that these should be handled as
> info messages, since they are invaluable in investigating problems.

This would be a pretty bad idea IMHO, since it would lead to bloating
the logs with autovacuum progress messages by default --- and whatever
you may think about it, I really doubt that the average DBA will want
those messages there all the time.

I wonder whether it would be practical to let the autovacuum daemon have
its own value of log_min_messages.  The alternative to that seems to be
to invent a new log severity level just for autovacuum, which is pretty
gross (especially since it's not obvious how it should sort relative to
LOG and DEBUG1).

                        regards, tom lane



--
Joe Maldonado

В списке pgsql-admin по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: autovacuum daemon question...
Следующее
От: "Jim C. Nasby"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: How can I join in the PostgreSql developing team ?