On Jan 3, 2008 8:54 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> I wrote:
> > Do we really need "fhour_t" and "fminute_t" on top of "fsec_t"?
> > This seems like a bad factorization ...
>
> After some more thought: I think that what's bugging me is that "fsec_t"
> is intended to denote "fractional seconds". The other cases you have
> here seem not to be intended to be "fractional hours" or "fractional
> minutes". I'm not quite sure what the right abstraction is, but it
> doesn't seem to be that.
I thought it meant "field seconds". That's why I used fhour_t and
fminute_t. I'll think about a better name.
wt