Re: timestamp typedefs

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: timestamp typedefs
Дата
Msg-id 28482.1199422444@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: timestamp typedefs  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: timestamp typedefs  ("Warren Turkal" <wturkal@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
I wrote:
> Do we really need "fhour_t" and "fminute_t" on top of "fsec_t"?
> This seems like a bad factorization ...

After some more thought: I think that what's bugging me is that "fsec_t"
is intended to denote "fractional seconds".  The other cases you have
here seem not to be intended to be "fractional hours" or "fractional
minutes".  I'm not quite sure what the right abstraction is, but it
doesn't seem to be that.
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: timestamp typedefs
Следующее
От: "Warren Turkal"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: timestamp typedefs