"Warren Turkal" <wturkal@gmail.com> writes:
> I have created the following patch in an effort to start cleaning up
> the timestamp datatype. Please let me know if something like this will
> help so that I know whether to keep going. BTW, it passes a "make
> check" AFAICT.
Do we really need "fhour_t" and "fminute_t" on top of "fsec_t"?
This seems like a bad factorization ...
regards, tom lane