Re: [HACKERS] Declarative partitioning - another take
| От | Peter Eisentraut |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Declarative partitioning - another take |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 7fd2e7ac-5831-4640-c009-5dfa97c632c3@2ndquadrant.com обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Declarative partitioning - another take (Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat@enterprisedb.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Declarative partitioning - another take
Re: [HACKERS] Declarative partitioning - another take |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 1/25/17 12:54 AM, Ashutosh Bapat wrote: > The documentation available at > https://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/static/sql-createtable.html, > does not make it clear that the lower bound of a range partition is > always inclusive and the higher one is exclusive. I think a note in > section " PARTITION OF parent_table FOR VALUES partition_bound_spec" > would be helpful. Hmm. I see the practical use of that, but I think this is going to be a source of endless confusion. Can we make that a bit clearer in the syntax, for example by using additional keywords (INCLUSIVE/EXCLUSIVE)? -- Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: