Hi,
On August 31, 2021 6:33:15 PM PDT, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
>On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 04:55:35AM +0200, Laurenz Albe wrote:
>> In the view of that, how about doubling PGSTAT_STAT_INTERVAL to 1000
>> milliseconds? That would mean slightly less up-to-date statistics, but
>> I doubt that that will be a problem. And it should even out the increase
>> in statistics messages, except in the case of lots of short-lived
>> sessions. But in that scenario you cannot have session statistics
>> without lots of extra messages, and such a workload has enough performance
>> problems as it is, so I don't think we have to specifically worry about it.
>
>Perhaps we could do that. Now, increasing an interval for the sake of
>balancing the extra load created by a feature while impacting the
>whole set of stats is not really appealing.
I think it's not helpful. Still increases the number of messages substantially in workloads with a lot of connections
doingoccasional queries. Which is common.
Andres
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.