Re: AW: AW: AW: WAL does not recover gracefully from ou t-of -dis k-sp ace

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: AW: AW: AW: WAL does not recover gracefully from ou t-of -dis k-sp ace
Дата
Msg-id 7901.984442532@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на RE: AW: AW: AW: WAL does not recover gracefully from ou t-of -dis k-sp ace  ("Mikheev, Vadim" <vmikheev@SECTORBASE.COM>)
Список pgsql-hackers
"Mikheev, Vadim" <vmikheev@SECTORBASE.COM> writes:
> Probably we should update XLogWrite to write() more than 1 block,
> but Tom should apply his patches first (btw, did you implement
> "log file size" condition for checkpoints, Tom?).

Yes I did.  There's a variable now to specify a checkpoint every N
log segments --- I figured that was good enough resolution, and it
allowed the test to be made only when we're rolling over to a new
segment, so it's not in a time-critical path.

If you're happy with what I did so far, I'll go ahead and commit.
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Mikheev, Vadim"
Дата:
Сообщение: RE: AW: AW: AW: WAL does not recover gracefully from ou t-of -dis k-sp ace
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: xlog patches reviewed