RE: AW: AW: AW: WAL does not recover gracefully from ou t-of -dis k-sp ace

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Mikheev, Vadim
Тема RE: AW: AW: AW: WAL does not recover gracefully from ou t-of -dis k-sp ace
Дата
Msg-id 8F4C99C66D04D4118F580090272A7A234D3311@sectorbase1.sectorbase.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответы Re: AW: AW: AW: WAL does not recover gracefully from ou t-of -dis k-sp ace  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
> > FSYNC:        257tps
> > O_DSYNC:      333tps   
> > 
> > Just(?) 30% faster, -:(
> 
> First of all, if you ask me, that is one hell of an improvement :-)

Of course -:) But tfsync tests were more promising -:)
Probably we should update XLogWrite to write() more than 1 block,
but Tom should apply his patches first (btw, did you implement
"log file size" condition for checkpoints, Tom?).

Vadim


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Mikheev, Vadim"
Дата:
Сообщение: xlog patches reviewed
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: AW: AW: AW: WAL does not recover gracefully from ou t-of -dis k-sp ace