Re: 8.0 beta1 and XP SP2
От | Magnus Hagander |
---|---|
Тема | Re: 8.0 beta1 and XP SP2 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 6BCB9D8A16AC4241919521715F4D8BCE4569D6@algol.sollentuna.se обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | 8.0 beta1 and XP SP2 (Oleg Letsinsky <oleg@ourmx.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: 8.0 beta1 and XP SP2
|
Список | pgsql-hackers-win32 |
> Hi, > > I'm wondering if anyone has tried running PgSQL on XP SP2? > > I have a problem with it - quite a big one. I have a perl DBI > script which is a migration tool from old MySQL database > format to a new PgSQL database. So here is a quick summary of > the situation. > > MySQL (win32) - perl - PgSQL (Linux server) Runs fine, full > speed, the script finishes its work in 20 minutes. > > Next, I move PgSQL to the windows side. > > MySQL (win32) - perl - PgSQL (win32, XP SP1) Runs fine, just > a bit slower (like 25 minutes) > > In both previous cases there were 100% CPU load, HD > activity, etc. - two databases raping poor windows XP workstation. Are both MySQL and PgSQL Win32 on the same machine, or two different machines? > Next, after SP2 installation - that's here the fun comes. The > process can take hours to complete. Actually, I never > had a patience to see it finished - last time I aborted > the process after 2 hours and the damn thing just finished > about 50% of its job. I switched PgSQL back to Linux without > changing anything else - no performance problems. I uninstalled > SP2 and checked again - all is ok, all goes full speed, 25 > minutes for task completion. Reinstalled SP2 - and the > problem came back. So for me it's quite obvious that SP2 has > screwed up PgSQL in some way. I've tried several web > forums, IRC - so far nobody seems to get into the same > situation since I'm likely to be the only PgSQL user stupid > enough to try SP2 :) Is the machine still pegged at 100% CPU, or is the CPU idle? What about the I/O? > Now some details on what script does. It's, like I said, a > migration script - it takes data from one database, changes > it slightly and puts it to another one, using simple inserts. > Nothing special. Although pg_restore seems to work just fine > even under SP2, no performance problems. Does your script run with just one connection, or does it open new connections often? > There's more. I've tried PowerGres database as well. It > experiences the same performance hit, no difference at all. Interesting. > Some details on the system - WinXP Pro, P4 2.4Ghz, 1GB RAM, > 200GB SATA Seagate drive. I've disabled that firewall thingy > and data execution prevention - again, nothing has changed. > I'm out of ideas... With disable firewall I assume you mean disable completely, and not just set "postgres can do whatevever it wants"? If not, disable it completely :-) Are you running any antivirus on the machine? If so, try uninstalling that too. I've seen AV products behave pretty differently on SP1 and SP2... //Magnus
В списке pgsql-hackers-win32 по дате отправления: