I was referring to the logs in the archive folder specified when WAL
archiving is turned on...not the pg_xlog folder.
I assume postgres will not use the logs in the archive folder
-----Original Message-----
From: Jim C. Nasby [mailto:jnasby@pervasive.com]
Sent: Monday, March 27, 2006 2:35 AM
To: Andy Shellam
Cc: Sriram Dandapani; pgsql-admin@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [ADMIN] WAL file naming convention
On Sat, Mar 25, 2006 at 05:51:13PM -0000, Andy Shellam wrote:
> As PostgreSQL numbers WALs sequentially, as long as your ls command by
> default orders listings by filename, then Yes. Or you could list by
the
> last modified date/time should give the same effect.
But note that the order it creates them in doesn't have much meaning,
because it can re-use them. So if you want to know anything about actual
current order of usage the filename is meaningless.
> _____
>
> From: pgsql-admin-owner@postgresql.org
> [mailto:pgsql-admin-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Sriram
Dandapani
> Sent: Saturday, 25 March, 2006 12:30 am
> To: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org
> Subject: [ADMIN] WAL file naming convention
>
>
>
> Hi
>
>
>
> Is is safe to assume that the unix ls command will return WAL files in
the
> same sequence as postgres creates them.
>
>
>
> e.g will ls <wal-file-folder> return files in the order that postgres
> created them
>
> !DSPAM:14,44248f2235041511888239!
--
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant jnasby@pervasive.com
Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117
vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461