Re: page 1 of relation global/11787 was uninitialized
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: page 1 of relation global/11787 was uninitialized |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 6594.1365528881@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: page 1 of relation global/11787 was uninitialized ("Stephen R. van den Berg" <srb@cuci.nl>) |
| Ответы |
Re: page 1 of relation global/11787 was uninitialized
Re: page 1 of relation global/11787 was uninitialized |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
"Stephen R. van den Berg" <srb@cuci.nl> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> It's conceivable that updating to something more current than 9.0.4
>> would get you out of this --- we've fixed quite a number of WAL replay
>> bugs in the last two years.
> I see that there is a 9.0.13, but that would be a source upgrade, since Debian
> doesn't provide later than 9.0.4 AFAICS.
That's a bit hard to believe, especially given that 9.0.13 fixes a
rather major security bug. Any packager that isn't offering something
more current than 9.0.4 is *seriously* misfeasant.
> I suppose upgrading to 9.1.9 is not recommended in this state, or is it?
You can't -- only a 9.0.x server will even try to start up against this
DB.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: