Re: Maybe a possible bug in the partitioning code?
| От | Tom Lane | 
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Maybe a possible bug in the partitioning code? | 
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 656221.1604334677@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст | 
| Ответ на | Maybe a possible bug in the partitioning code? (John Scalia <jayknowsunix@gmail.com>) | 
| Ответы | Re: Maybe a possible bug in the partitioning code? | 
| Список | pgsql-admin | 
John Scalia <jayknowsunix@gmail.com> writes:
> While I’m waiting for my devs to confirm the first table that I partitioned is working correctly, I started working
onsecond of three that I need to do. So, I added the code to end of my original script, but there was a typo in it.
Now,as this code runs in a transaction block, so I don’t think anything it created should actually be present in the
database,but on a subsequent rerunning, I got an error that one of the partition tables actually exists already.
However,I cannot see it, nor drop it from the server. The error in the script is: relation
“temp_my_second_table_global”already exists, but the system cannot see it in order to drop it, saying
“temp_my_second_table_global”does not exist. That’s really a catch-22. Is there a system table where I can look and
maybedrop it from there directly? 
Kinda sounds like a confusion over search_path, ie script is creating
table in some schema that's not in your interactive search path?
In psql, try
   \d *.temp_my_second_table_global
to see instances of temp_my_second_table_global in all schemas.
            regards, tom lane
		
	В списке pgsql-admin по дате отправления: