Re: Confusion on shared buffer

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Robert Haas
Тема Re: Confusion on shared buffer
Дата
Msg-id 603c8f070910031802x4de8770l29d271185474360@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Confusion on shared buffer  (S Arvind <arvindwill@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: Confusion on shared buffer  (Gurjeet Singh <singh.gurjeet@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-performance
On Sat, Oct 3, 2009 at 2:11 AM, S Arvind <arvindwill@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks Robert,
>          So for our scenario what is the most important factor to be noted
> for performance.

Tough to say without benchmarking, but if you have a lot of small
databases that easily fit in RAM, and a lot of concurrent connections,
I would think you'd want to spend your hardware $ on maximizing the
number of cores.

But there are many in this forum who have much more experience with
these things than me, so take that with a grain of salt...

(You might also want to look at consolidating some of those databases
- maybe use one database with multiple schemas - that would probably
help performance significantly.)

...Robert

В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: S Arvind
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Confusion on shared buffer
Следующее
От: std pik
Дата:
Сообщение: Postgres performance