Re: Confusion on shared buffer
От
S Arvind
Тема
Re: Confusion on shared buffer
Дата
Msg-id
abf9211d0910022311n26b86d38y6928b1aec8c4c9c9@mail.gmail.com
Ответ на
Re: Confusion on shared buffer (Robert Haas)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
Confusion on shared buffer S Arvind <arvindwill@gmail.com>
Re: Confusion on shared buffer Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: Confusion on shared buffer S Arvind <arvindwill@gmail.com>
Re: Confusion on shared buffer Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: Confusion on shared buffer Gurjeet Singh <singh.gurjeet@gmail.com>
Re: Confusion on shared buffer Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Thanks Robert,
So for our scenario what is the most important factor to be noted for performance.
-Arvind S
So for our scenario what is the most important factor to be noted for performance.
-Arvind S
On Sat, Oct 3, 2009 at 12:49 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 4:11 AM, S Arvind <arvindwill@gmail.com> wrote:I'm pretty sure that won't help to make shared buffers larger than the
> In some docs i read that shared buffer must be increased based on the
> maximum dataset size. For my scenario the dataset size is relative small
> less then a Gb, but database# handled by a server is nearly 200db per
> server and average connection# to server will be >500 (approx 5/per each
> DB). So for this scenario will increase in shared buffer will increase the
> performance.
> FYI: RAM in 8GB
size of your entire cluster.
...Robert
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления
