Re: Call for objections: deprecate postmaster -o switch?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: Call for objections: deprecate postmaster -o switch?
Дата
Msg-id 5607.1006728909@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Call for objections: deprecate postmaster -o switch?  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Ответы Re: Call for objections: deprecate postmaster -o switch?  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Re: Call for objections: deprecate postmaster -o switch?  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> No it's not, unfortunately.  BSD versions of getopt, including the one we
> ship as replacement, have a bug that considers any argument that starts
> with '--' to be equivalent with '--' (which means end of options).

Ugh.  Nonetheless, that doesn't equate to "you need GNU getopt to use
this".  Can we be more specific about whether it works or not?
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Sergio Pili
Дата:
Сообщение: Change in rule behavior?
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Change in rule behavior?