Re: Call for objections: deprecate postmaster -o switch?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Peter Eisentraut
Тема Re: Call for objections: deprecate postmaster -o switch?
Дата
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.30.0111261553060.612-100000@peter.localdomain
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Call for objections: deprecate postmaster -o switch?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: Call for objections: deprecate postmaster -o switch?  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane writes:

> Ugh.  Nonetheless, that doesn't equate to "you need GNU getopt to use
> this".

... which is not what it used to say either.

> Can we be more specific about whether it works or not?

I reported the bug on 2000-11-06 to this list and added the -c option
briefly afterwards.  The bug caused initdb to fail on whatever FreeBSD
version postgresql.org was running at the time.

I agree that we could alter the "works on some platforms" to "might not
work on some platforms".

-- 
Peter Eisentraut   peter_e@gmx.net



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Fernando Nasser
Дата:
Сообщение: [Fwd: [PATCHES] Libpq support for precision and scale]
Следующее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Call for objections: deprecate postmaster -o switch?