Re: PATCH: Reducing lock strength of trigger and foreign key DDL

On 01/30/2015 07:48 AM, Michael Paquier wrote:
> Looking at the latest patch, it seems that in
> AlterTableGetLockLevel@tablecmds.c we ought to put AT_ReAddConstraint,
> AT_AddConstraintRecurse and AT_ProcessedConstraint under the same
> banner as AT_AddConstraint. Thoughts?

A new version of the patch is attached which treats them as the same for
locking. I think it is correct and improves readability to do so.

--
Andreas Karlsson