Re: PATCH: Reducing lock strength of trigger and foreign key DDL

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Simon Riggs
Тема Re: PATCH: Reducing lock strength of trigger and foreign key DDL
Дата
Msg-id CA+U5nMJPn9hVBp3L0+wi7o2r7ouTVUUk=wWpGF5qPXkR9_BpAg@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: PATCH: Reducing lock strength of trigger and foreign key DDL  (Andreas Karlsson <andreas@proxel.se>)
Ответы Re: PATCH: Reducing lock strength of trigger and foreign key DDL  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
Re: PATCH: Reducing lock strength of trigger and foreign key DDL  (Andreas Karlsson <andreas@proxel.se>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 7 February 2015 at 20:05, Andreas Karlsson <andreas@proxel.se> wrote:
> On 01/30/2015 07:48 AM, Michael Paquier wrote:
>>
>> Looking at the latest patch, it seems that in
>> AlterTableGetLockLevel@tablecmds.c we ought to put AT_ReAddConstraint,
>> AT_AddConstraintRecurse and AT_ProcessedConstraint under the same
>> banner as AT_AddConstraint. Thoughts?
>
>
> A new version of the patch is attached which treats them as the same for
> locking. I think it is correct and improves readability to do so.

Committed. We move forwards, slowly but surely. Thanks for the patch.

-- Simon Riggs                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, RemoteDBA, Training &
Services



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tomas Vondra
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: PATCH: nbklno in _hash_splitbucket unused (after ed9cc2b)
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Column mis-spelling hints vs case folding