On Sun, Feb 8, 2015 at 10:05 AM, Andreas Karlsson <andreas@proxel.se> wrote:
> On 01/30/2015 07:48 AM, Michael Paquier wrote:
>>
>> Looking at the latest patch, it seems that in
>> AlterTableGetLockLevel@tablecmds.c we ought to put AT_ReAddConstraint,
>> AT_AddConstraintRecurse and AT_ProcessedConstraint under the same
>> banner as AT_AddConstraint. Thoughts?
>
>
> A new version of the patch is attached which treats them as the same for
> locking. I think it is correct and improves readability to do so.
Well then, let's switch it to "Ready for committer". I am moving as
well this entry to the next CF with the same status.
--
Michael